Evidence Log · E-V99-059
In a Request for Department Action to Susan Gough, Elizondo disputes DoD statements that he had no assigned AATIP duties, says he ran the program, arranged pilot briefings in the SECDEF suite and transferred AATIP responsibilities in writing before his Oct 2017 resignation, and names Reid, Tipton, Stratton and Mellon as possible corroborators
DisputedFirsthand2020-06-03 · Direct assertion documented in email
Record
- Date
- 2020-06-03
- Claim or item
- In a Request for Department Action to Susan Gough, Elizondo disputes DoD statements that he had no assigned AATIP duties, says he ran the program, arranged pilot briefings in the SECDEF suite and transferred AATIP responsibilities in writing before his Oct 2017 resignation, and names Reid, Tipton, Stratton and Mellon as possible corroborators
- Evidence category
- Direct assertion documented in email
- Firsthand?
- Yes (self-report)
- Publicly accessible?
- DoD FOIA 21-F-0938, PDF pp. 1–4
- Independent corroboration
- Transfer instrument, attendance records and Gough's original statements not reproduced
- Assessment
- Disputed role; listing witnesses is not their testimony; misinformation allegation does not establish intent
- Notes
- DoD FOIA 21-F-0938 (SRC-V99-125); also cites Tyler Rogoway criticism of DoD public-affairs responsiveness
- Linked case IDs
- CASE-090
Why this grade
DisputedFirsthand From the Evidence Log's Assessment ("Disputed role; listing witnesses is not their testimony; misinformation allegation does not establish intent"), and Firsthand? ("Yes (self-report)"). Grade rules.