What the record showsUAP Docket

Case study · CASE-090 · Documentary records / institutional-role dispute

Elizondo AATIP role and OSD/OUSD(I) placement: DoD FOIA 21-F-0938 emails

Not assessedWhere Office of the Secretary of Defense (OUSD(I)), Pentagon, Washington areaWhen 2017-08 to 2020-06 (emails); 2008 to Oct 2017 role asserted by Elizondo

Case

Overview
A 9-page DoD FOIA release (21-F-0938, PA-Elizondo-Emails) reproduces August–September 2017 emails between Luis Elizondo and Neill Tipton, then Acting Director, Defense Intelligence for Technical Collection and Special Programs in OUSD(I), about a portfolio and its proposed transfer to Tipton; Elizondo's 5 June 2019 email attaching that correspondence and describing unfunded AATIP continuation; and his 3 June 2020 Request for Department Action to Susan Gough contesting DoD statements that he had no assigned AATIP duties. The emails place Elizondo in OSD/OUSD(I) and show coordination on a portfolio in Aug–Sep 2017; the 2017 emails do not themselves name AATIP.
Investigative phases
Aug 2017 Program Meeting thread (Elizondo–Tipton, PDF pp. 8–9); Sep 2017 update thread (p. 7); Oct 2017 Elizondo resignation (per his 2020 email); 2019-06-05 substantiating-documentation email (pp. 5–6); 2020-06-03 Request for Department Action to Gough (pp. 1–4); FOIA release 21-F-0938
Reported phenomena
None directly; the case concerns program designation, organizational placement and the public-affairs dispute over Elizondo's AATIP role
Public evidence status
DoD FOIA PDF released (no public URL recorded in the research tabs). A DoD annotation on PDF p. 7 states DoD cannot validate the authenticity of material attached to a private citizen's email: the release establishes the records were held, not that every attachment is authentic.
Alternative explanations / caveats
The 2017 emails do not explicitly name AATIP; identifying the 2017 portfolio as AATIP comes from Elizondo's 2019/2020 retrospective emails. Tipton's 25 Aug 2017 reply says he needs to know what the effort actually is, so it is not an endorsement of AATIP status. SECDEF front-office approval, a written transfer before his Oct 2017 resignation and pilot briefings in the SECDEF suite are Elizondo's assertions: the approver is unnamed and no charter, transfer instrument, calendar or meeting log is attached. Naming Reid, Tipton, Stratton and Mellon as corroborators is not their testimony. Gough's statements are quoted by Elizondo, not reproduced. His misinformation allegation does not establish DoD intent. Keep separate from the DIA-funded AAWSAP (2008–2012); do not claim a proven formal AATIP directorship or a separately chartered OSD AATIP office throughout 2008–2017.
Next research tasks
Obtain government-original copies (.msg/.eml) of the 2017 emails; locate signed authorities, charter, tasking and the alleged written transfer; request Tipton calendars and SECDEF office-suite meeting records; collect Gough's and other DoD public-affairs statements with dates; seek independent statements from the named corroborators; record a public URL for the 21-F-0938 PDF.
Last reviewed
2026-11-12

Assessment

Not yet in the Case Assessment Matrix.

Evidence (9)

Documents gathered (9 lines of evidence)

9 readable here · 0 with a linked primary record · 0 still need a document · All cases on the evidence map

On the timeline (2)

  • 2017-08-22 to 2017-09-11 Elizondo and Neill Tipton (OUSD(I)) exchange emails on a portfolio and its proposed transfer to Tipton Reported
    Released in DoD FOIA 21-F-0938; DoD cannot validate attachments; emails do not name AATIP
  • 2020-06-03 Elizondo sends Request for Department Action to Susan Gough contesting DoD statements on his AATIP duties Reported
    Self-report; DoD statements quoted only by Elizondo