Person evidence · E-GAL-OCEAN
Gallaudet argues oceans may serve as hiding places for UAP and discusses possible transmedium activity
Claim unverifiedSecondhandThe statement or record is documented; the underlying claim is not; conveyed by someone else. 2026 · Expert opinion / hypothesis
Why this grade
Claim unverifiedSecondhand From the Evidence Log's Assessment ("Prominent attributed hypothesis; not a verified finding"), and Firsthand? ("No direct proof of hiding-place premise"). Grade rules.
Record
- Date
- 2026
- Evidence category
- Expert opinion / hypothesis
- Firsthand?
- No direct proof of hiding-place premise
- Publicly accessible?
- Yes: public interview
- Independent corroboration
- No independently validated ocean concealment evidence established
- Assessment
- Prominent attributed hypothesis; not a verified finding
- Notes
- Evaluate each reported USO encounter separately; distinguish mapping gaps from evidence of UAP. Chunk M (2026-11-12): his sworn written statement for the November 2024 hearing, SRC-GAL-24 p. 3 (UAP 'known to exhibit transmedium travel through the air-sea interface'; unidentified submerged objects) and p. 7, and the hearing transcript SRC-211 p. 26 (USS Omaha entering the water) record the same argument. The 'hiding places' framing is from the interview only.
- Linked case IDs
- CASE-010
From the workbook: the Evidence Log sheet.